FREDONIA PROJECT SITREP 25: U.S. POLICY DEVELOPMENTS 28 Feb – 29 Apr 2026

DATE-TIME GROUP: 0416000ZAPRIL26

FROM: EMBASSY OF FREDONIA, WASHINGTON, D.C.

TO: MFA NAGADOCHES

CLASSIFICATION: CONEOFSILENCE // FREDONIAN EYES ONLY

SUBJECT: Iran War, Ceasefire Fragility, and Regional Escalation

SUMMARY: IN ACCORDANCE WITH MFA DIRECTIVE 1826-APRIL-1, THIS EMBASSY HAS INITIATED A REGULAR SERIES OF ANALYTICAL DISPATCHES REGARDING DEVELOPMENTS IN THE IRAN WAR AND ITS BROADER REGIONAL IMPACTS. THE SERIES, DESIGNATED “THE FREDONIA PROJECT,” WILL BE CIRCULATED UNDER STANDARD SITREP PROTOCOL. UNAUTHORIZED PUBLICATION HAS BEEN OBSERVED VIA A THIRD-PARTY ENTITY KNOWN AS “THE STEADY STATE.” PRESUMED LEAK. NO ACTION REQUIRED.

On 28 February 2026, with no Congressional concurrence, no warning or briefing of the US public, Donald Trump, in collusion with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, launched a military invasion of Iran and Lebanon. This war, which is spectacularly unpopular with the US public, has lasted with one ceasefire, which was extended for several weeks. At this writing, the war has not been approved by Congress or explained to the citizens of the US or any other country. (Ambassador Comment: Per Heather Cox Richardson, President Trump has refused to get Congressional approval for his invasion of Iran under the 1973 War Powers Act, which gives a President authority to take military action by claiming that the US is under an imminent threat. , claiming that Iran posed an imminent threat to the US. Also, Per Ms. Richardson: “…the War Powers Act says the president must notify Congress of any such action within 48 hours of its start. Then, by 60 days after that notification, the president has to stop using the military for that action unless the Congress either declares war or authorizes the use of the military for that specific action.” The 60 day mark referred to in the previous sentence will fall on this coming Friday, 1 May.)

The US/Israel war against Iran, through the current ceasefire, has followed a familiar escalation pattern. Although the initial attacks were presented as limited and “in response to an imminent threat to the United States”, the conflict quickly widened. Iran responded immediately, launching missile and drone strikes against Israel, US bases in the region, as well as attacks on neighboring Arab countries. On April 8, the US began a blockade of Iranian ports, which resulted in a broad regional crisis in which military exchange, maritime risk, and diplomatic maneuvering have all advanced at once.

The ceasefire, brokered by Pakistan, between Iran and the US was extended, and as of 26 April, GMT 1710, BBC reports that attacks throughout the region are continuing. This iteration of the ceasefire seems to mean that the United States will continue military operations against Iran, while, per the BBC, Iran responded that the Strait was closed. On 7 April 2026, US President Trump announced a ceasefire, which collapsed after the first US-Iran peace talks ended on April 13. Almost immediately after the end of peace talks, on 13/14 April, the US forces began a naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz.

It is, as of 29 April, unclear where or whether the peace talks between the US and Iran stand. It appears that the United States’ negotiating team is on stand down, while some sort of back-channel by phone talks might be continuing. (Ambassador comment: The original ceasefire was cleared a short time before Trump’s deadline, and again, Trump “promised” massive retaliation. Trump’s ongoing threats of US attacks on civilian infrastructure, if acted upon, may still be considered war crimes under the Geneva Convention of 1949 and Additional Protocols. If Trump understands that international law applies in time of war, unlikely at best, he seems unbothered by the thought of committing war crimes; an unsurprising but disturbing addition to the long list of things Trump does or says that are unacceptable.) The US blockade of the Strait, as well as the extended ceasefire, are still in effect as of 28 April GMT 1745.

At the same time, the scope of any US-Israeli Iran deal remains contested. Israeli leaders have said the ceasefire does not include Lebanon, while Iranian officials and some regional players have argued that the understanding was meant to cover Israeli strikes in Lebanon. Continued Israeli operations in Lebanon risk collapsing the already fragile “pause” in the US-Iran conflict and causing the conflict to widen an already multi-front regional war.

Inside Iran, the war is being used to tighten political control and frame the conflict as a test of regime endurance. State media has emphasized resilience, martyrdom, and national unity, while the security apparatus has moved to suppress dissent, detain suspected collaborators, and warn against panic or public criticism. (Ambassador comment: so much for Trumpian declarations of a failed regime.) That internal tightening is important in that it gives Tehran a domestic narrative of resistance even as it absorbs military pressure abroad.

The conflict is placing a new strain on Iran’s military and economic system. Repeated strikes, air defense losses, and the need to protect critical infrastructure complicated command and control, at the same time that heightened risk around oil exports, shipping, and regional proxy networks threatens revenue and leverage. In practical terms, Iran is trying to fight, deter, and stabilize at once, a difficult balance that makes the current pause highly unstable and increases the possibility of renewed escalation if any side decides the ceasefire is no longer serving its interests.

(Ambassador comments: This war is complicated by Donald Trump’s lack of understanding of so many things, which is further complicated by his staff of wholly unserious and untrained “negotiators” and “officials.” At best, these people can negotiate a real estate-like deal with benefits for themselves (see Kushner 2021 $2billion gift from the Saudis). At worst, they can negotiate nothing in a situation in which they are unfamiliar, untrained, and aggressively confident. It seems probable that experienced, longtime, professional Iranian negotiators will hand these guys a deal that is not great for the US, and neither these guys nor their boss will have any idea of what they have given away.

As for the rest of us, we will have to deal with whatever the end of this conflict includes, and we will not know how we got here since Donald Trump rarely says anything that is straightforward, accurate, or remotely true. We won’t really know why we jumped into this fray, we won’t know what we hoped to gain from this war, and we certainly won’t know when we’ve arrived at the turning point or end of this war. The comments of most leaders at most times include some vague words that would explain the actions taken and the settlement signed. Not so much with Donald Trump. He is back and forth, up and down, and side to side all at once. It could be considered an asset in conducting strategic analysis or actions, if such confusion were not accompanied by macho nonsense and cosplaying at all times.)

Founded in 2016, The Steady State is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) organization of more than 400 former senior national security professionals. Our membership includes former officials from the CIA, FBI, Department of State, Department of Defense, and Department of Homeland Security. Drawing on deep expertise across national security disciplines, including intelligence, diplomacy, military affairs, and law, we advocate for constitutional democracy, the rule of law, and the preservation of America’s national security institutions.