Category Added in a WPeMatico Campaign

Normalization of the Presence of Uniformed Military on our City Streets

The decisive question is no longer whether Trump tests constitutional limits, but whether those around him will resist or accommodate expanding executive power.

The country is well launched on the road to autocracy, and the President is leading the MAGA faithful and the rest of us into an authoritarian abyss. Every week, there is a new incident or event confirming this dangerous truth.

After ten years, it’s beyond time for non-MAGA “Republicans” to step forward and work actively to counter the one-party Trump cult, its destabilizing corrosion, self-dealing and corruption, and endangerment of our national security. It’s simply unfathomable how MAGA and non-MAGA alike — have been and are being played.

The problem is the man himself; examples are endless. The starting point is his total lack of a moral compass, evident to all, even to himself, if he understands what he says and does. For him, truth and morality do not matter and are simply obstacles to his manipulative political ambition. He tests legal and moral limits to prepare the ground for even more egregious statements and actions. It has been a long-term march toward consolidation of autocratic rule and re-shaping the U.S. political system, in a glaring challenge to the U.S. Constitution, to sustain the rule of MAGA elites once his time on the stage has passed.

He has been preparing this ground for decades. He challenged President Reagan’s successful foreign policy vis-à-vis the Soviet Union in three major U.S. papers on September 2, 1987, built his tough guy political brand based on a “reality” TV show, fed the birther myth about President Obama, and launched an unrelenting assault on the media and free press. He justified his mountain of falsehoods with “people are saying,” and countless repetitions of “Only I alone can fix it” and “I know better than anyone.”

He openly dismissed Constitutional rule during the October 19, 2016 Presidential debate in Las Vegas, a coldly un-American strategy that should have outraged the nation and immediately disqualified his candidacy. In his first term, Trump was, as the Washington Post carefully and credibly documented, an administration of 30,000 misrepresentations or outright lies. His behavior in the wake of his November 2020 electoral defeat was both amoral and incendiary, and on January 6, 2021, he brazenly manipulated a mob to block Congressional certification of Biden’s election.

Share

The list goes on, with Trump now delivering more of the same, but on steroids. His wholly disingenuous disavowal of the hard right Project 2025 document during the campaign was followed by his tsunami of Project-2025 related and legally challengeable executive decrees that created deep and contentious disruption of the country. Gutting the heart of Federal government staff and programs benefiting rank and file Americans, food support via SNAP, disaster relief via FEMA, sound public health programs etc., and the world (USAID) was done without remorse or valid justification.

Here we are approaching mid-2026, and the country’s situation couldn’t be more perilous. Uncertainty abounds on all fronts but one, the self-enrichment of the President, his family, and the MAGA monied elites and fellow travelers. He and his team of acolytes are working 24/7 to undercut popular trust of and confidence in the gamut of U.S. institutions and practices.

Politically, his efforts to normalize the presence of the U.S. military on the streets of U.S. cities foreshadows direct federal intervention in and disruption of the November mid-year elections; he has excoriated the Supreme Court, and pounded the former Republican Party into a rubber stamp of party-line faces in a manner reminiscent of those in communist party meetings in the Soviet Union, China, and North Korea. For those of us with experience in such countries, the MAGA movement’s authoritarianism looks distressingly familiar.

The U.S. economy, once the anchor and engine of the world economy, confronts problems only deepened by Trump’s executive decrees and administrative actions, fiscal irresponsibility, and unbelievable statements. The President’s unceasing effort to erode confidence in public institutions has its economic dimension: non-stop attacks on the Federal Reserve Board, politicization of such trusted institutions as the Bureau of Labor Statistics, similar politicization of federal health institutions, and the dismantling of the science foundation of national environmental programs.

Meanwhile, Trump’s economic authoritarianism has brought chaos to the country’s foreign trade via unconstitutional tariff wars with friends and rivals alike. He then willfully and unnecessarily exacerbated inflation through a misguided and poorly managed war with Iran, which is having serious and adverse economic impact around the globe.

Perhaps most serious, and threatening, of all, the President’s authoritarian and autocratic governance has weakened the U.S. internationally to the point where one is forced to ask, “Why?” A naïve and flawed National Security Strategy, an inexplicable but definite alignment with Russian strategic interests, unending bullying and bluster against such stalwart allies and partners as Canada and fellow NATO members, whimsical and extra-legal actions on any number of fronts, and simple non-stop hubris have greatly diminished respect for the U.S. and its Presidency.

It is questionable whether the U.S. can regain its stature and influence even if the MAGA movement becomes the regrettable relic of history that it should.

It is time to meet the moment. The President’s take-no-prisoners retribution against Republican Party critics or non-yes men and women, and his unconscionable self-dealing with respect to the creation of a $1.8 billion political slush fund, should be decisive breaking points for the “thin red line*” as a final straw or bridge too far, irrefutably confirming that the man is in it solely for himself and not for the country or you.

The President is a man of no morals, no remorse, no interest in the country or his fellow Americans. While the clock is ticking until November, there is time to turn the authoritarian tide, but inaction or passive hope will not meet the test.

The time for truth, integrity, and principle is now.

*This essay is one of a series of an open letters to “The Thin Red Line” of MAGA and Non-MAGA Republicans

Leave a comment

Mike Mozur is a retired Senior Foreign Service Officer with over 33 years of experience in the Soviet Union, former Soviet Union, Eastern Europe, the Balkans and Latin America. Mike also led a global professional association of environmental scientists and writes periodically on current political, economic, and social issues. He is a member of The Steady State.

Founded in 2016, The Steady State is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) organization of more than 400 former senior national security professionals. Our membership includes former officials from the CIA, FBI, Department of State, Department of Defense, and Department of Homeland Security. Drawing on deep expertise across national security disciplines, including intelligence, diplomacy, military affairs, and law, we advocate for constitutional democracy, the rule of law, and the preservation of America’s national security institutions.

Powered by WPeMatico

The debate is not fundamentally about architecture or design. It is a debate about whether public institutions reflect democratic values—or increasingly reflect the image and tastes of a single leader.

The current controversy surrounding the proposed White House ballroom, the “Trump Arch,” and now the repainting of the Old Executive Office Building has generated intense debate. Architects, historians, preservationists, and critics have weighed in passionately on whether these projects are tasteful, vulgar, grand, garish, historically sensitive, or historically destructive. To many Americans, arguments over the color of a federal building or the construction of a ballroom may seem trivial. There are wars overseas, inflation at home, political violence, and deep institutional distrust. Compared to such matters, a gold-toned interior or an oversized ceremonial hall can appear merely eccentric, even harmless.

But the issue is not the architecture itself. The issue is what the architecture is intended to communicate.

We at the Steady State are not art critics. Our expertise is not beauty. It is power. More specifically, it is the study of how democratic systems weaken, how authoritarian systems emerge, and how strongmen consolidate personal rule. And those of us who have watched autocrats rise overseas have seen this pattern before.

In authoritarian systems, aesthetic disagreement gradually becomes framed not as disagreement with a design choice, but as disrespect toward the leader himself. State symbolism and personal symbolism begin to merge. Criticism of the ruler’s tastes becomes criticism of the nation. The distinction between public property and personal property begins to erode. This is not unique to any one ideology or region. Variants of this phenomenon have appeared in right-wing and left-wing dictatorships alike. It appears in palaces, triumphal arches, massive portraits, monumental architecture, carefully choreographed ceremonies, and the cultivation of a highly personalized visual culture centered on the leader.

Share

Authoritarian systems are intensely personal. Democracies are institutional; autocracies are individual. Democracies emphasize offices, laws, and procedures. Autocracies emphasize leaders, personalities, tastes, and symbols. Over time, the state ceases to represent the people collectively and instead becomes an extension of one man’s preferences, ambitions, image, and ego. The personalization of rule is often heralded, reinforced, and normalized through aesthetics.

The leader’s image becomes ubiquitous. His preferred style becomes “national” style. Buildings, monuments, ceremonies, and visual symbolism become instruments not merely of government but of personal dominance. The point is not beauty. The point is authority. And, we have seen this dynamic repeatedly abroad.

What matters is not whether any individual project is attractive. What matters is the assertion embedded within the project.

President Trump increasingly presents himself not as the President of the United States, temporarily vested with powers defined and constrained by the Constitution, but as the dominant leader of the nation whose personal instincts should define national identity itself. What he thinks is beautiful, Americans are expected to affirm as beautiful. What he considers patriotic becomes patriotism. What he considers appropriate becomes what institutions are expected to display. That is a profound shift in civic culture.

A president may certainly have preferences. Every president does. But there is a difference between preference and command. There is a difference between advocacy and expectation. There is a difference between influence and cultural domination. In healthy democracies, citizens retain the right to reject the ruler’s tastes without being treated as enemies of the state or opponents of the nation itself. That principle may sound abstract. It is not.

The American constitutional tradition was designed specifically to resist this form of personalized rule. The Framers had lived under monarchy. They were deeply suspicious of political systems that merged state identity with the identity of a single leader. The Constitution does not establish an elected king. It establishes a temporary officeholder whose authority is limited and guided by the entire constitutional structure: Congress, the courts, federalism, civil liberties, elections, and law. Article II grants executive power. It does not grant aesthetic supremacy.

The erosion of democratic culture rarely begins with tanks in the streets. More often, it begins with normalization of speech and actions previously viewed as abnormal. Citizens gradually become accustomed to treating the leader’s personality as synonymous with the nation. Public institutions become stages for personal branding. Governing becomes theater centered on one man’s image, one man’s tastes, one man’s grievances, and one man’s desires. By the time societies recognize the danger clearly, the underlying civic habits that sustain democracy are often already weakened.

This is not fundamentally about a ballroom. It is not fundamentally about paint. It is not fundamentally about arches, columns, drapery, or ornamentation. You may not care what color a federal building is painted. You may not care whether a ballroom is constructed near the White House. You may even genuinely like the aesthetic choices being proposed. But you should care deeply whether any man in the White House acquires the cultural authority to tell Americans what they must admire, what they must praise, what they must consider patriotic, and ultimately what they are permitted to value.

That is not a question of architecture. It is a question of freedom.

Leave a comment

Steven A. Cash served as a prosecutor in the Manhattan District Attorney’s office before joining the CIA in 1994 as Assistant General counsel and subsequently serving as an intelligence officer in the Directorate of Operations. In 2001 he joined the Senate Select committee on Intelligence as Counsel and designee-staffer to Senator Diane Feinstein). He later served as a senior staffer in the House Select Committee on Homeland Security, the Department of Energy, the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology and Homeland Security and the Department of Energy. In the private sector he has advised on national security, counterintelligence, and technology policy and served on the Biological Sciences Experts Group under the Director of National Intelligence. Mr. Cash is currently the Executive Director of The Steady State.

Founded in 2016, The Steady State is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) organization of more than 400 former senior national security professionals. Our membership includes former officials from the CIA, FBI, Department of State, Department of Defense, and Department of Homeland Security. Drawing on deep expertise across national security disciplines, including intelligence, diplomacy, military affairs, and law, we advocate for constitutional democracy, the rule of law, and the preservation of America’s national security institutions.

Powered by WPeMatico

Host Lauren C. Anderson, former senior FBI executive, sits down with pollster Stefan Hankin of Lincoln Park Strategies and journalist Joel Anderson of The Ringer and Slate to unpack a national poll released in May 2026.

Key findings: 54% of Americans say they hesitate to express political views at work, online, or in their communities because they worry about the consequences. And 76% express some level of concern that the U.S. is moving toward a more authoritarian form of government. The conversation explores political self-censorship, pressure on First Amendment norms, erosion of the rule of law, and the silencing of critics and journalists.

Together, they discuss generational divides, including Gen Z’s higher confidence in democracy compared with Boomers; the mainstreaming of slurs and hateful speech; and why rebuilding democratic guardrails will take years. Stefan shares how his mother’s memories of 1930s Berlin shape his view of today’s warning signs, while Joel offers practical advice on rebuilding community through schools, churches, volunteer organizations, and local elections.

View the Episode Transcript:

Guest info: Stefan Hankin is the founder of Lincoln Park Strategies, with over two decades of experience in public opinion polling, data analytics, market research, and communication strategy for Fortune 500 companies, local governments, and political candidates. He was part of the polling team for the election of Barack Obama as the 44th president of the United States. His work has appeared in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, and the Christian Science Monitor. He’s a “recovering rugby player,” an “old‑man hockey player,” and an “aspiring ski bum.”

Joel Anderson is an award‑winning multimedia journalist, senior staff writer at The Ringer, and co‑host of The Press Box podcast. He previously hosted seasons 3, 6, and 8 of Slate’s award‑winning Slow Burn narrative history podcast and co‑hosted Hang Up and Listen. He has worked at ESPN, BuzzFeed, the Atlanta Journal‑Constitution, and the Associated Press. His 2014 BuzzFeed piece “The Two Michael Sam’s” was featured in The Best American Sports Writing 2015. He is a native of Houston and a graduate of TCU.

Founded in 2016, The Steady State is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) organization of more than 400 former senior national security professionals. Our membership includes former officials from the CIA, FBI, Department of State, Department of Defense, and Department of Homeland Security. Drawing on deep expertise across national security disciplines, including intelligence, diplomacy, military affairs, and law, we advocate for constitutional democracy, the rule of law, and the preservation of America’s national security institutions.

Powered by WPeMatico

Today we remember the Americans who gave their lives in service to this country.

The best way to honor them is not only with gratitude, but with responsibility. We owe them a republic worthy of their sacrifice: one grounded in truth, accountable government, equal justice, and the steady defense of democracy itself.

Memorial Day asks us to pause, to mourn, and to remember that freedom is never self-sustaining. It is protected by those who serve, and preserved by citizens who refuse to take it for granted.

May we honor the fallen not just in words, but in how we care for the country they died defending.

Founded in 2016, The Steady State is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) organization of more than 400 former senior national security professionals. Our membership includes former officials from the CIA, FBI, Department of State, Department of Defense, and Department of Homeland Security. Drawing on deep expertise across national security disciplines, including intelligence, diplomacy, military affairs, and law, we advocate for constitutional democracy, the rule of law, and the preservation of America’s national security institutions.

Powered by WPeMatico

Today we remember the Americans who gave their lives in service to this country.

The best way to honor them is not only with gratitude, but with responsibility. We owe them a republic worthy of their sacrifice: one grounded in truth, accountable government, equal justice, and the steady defense of democracy itself.

Memorial Day asks us to pause, to mourn, and to remember that freedom is never self-sustaining. It is protected by those who serve, and preserved by citizens who refuse to take it for granted.

May we honor the fallen not just in words, but in how we care for the country they died defending.

Founded in 2016, The Steady State is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) organization of more than 400 former senior national security professionals. Our membership includes former officials from the CIA, FBI, Department of State, Department of Defense, and Department of Homeland Security. Drawing on deep expertise across national security disciplines, including intelligence, diplomacy, military affairs, and law, we advocate for constitutional democracy, the rule of law, and the preservation of America’s national security institutions.

Powered by WPeMatico


The Steady State provides both a warning and a call to action: The greatest threat to the United States is not a sudden collapse of democracy but the gradual normalization of intimidation, institutional erosion, unchecked executive power, and public disengagement. We contend that democratic resilience ultimately depends not only on institutions, but on citizens willing to defend them.

Read more…


THE ESSENTIALS


Social Media Take-Away of the Week

A combatant commander should not have to be cornered into acknowledging the plain text of the Law of War Manual. “No quarter” is prohibited. It’s a simple question with a simple answer.

THE MISSION

A Message from the Executive Director of The Steady State, Steven A. Cash

“…Many of you have already been incredibly generous by becoming paid subscribers to our Substack. That support helps us do the work, of course. It gives us resources. But just as important, it tells us that people care about what they’re reading here and believe this kind of work is worth sustaining.

We’ve also heard from many of you asking a simple question: what more can I do?

That question is what led us to create the Steady State Auxiliary.”

#HOLDFAST

Leave a comment

Listen to the Sentinel podcast

Share The Steady State

Founded in 2016, The Steady State is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) organization of more than 400 former senior national security professionals. Our membership includes former officials from the CIA, FBI, Department of State, Department of Defense, and Department of Homeland Security. Drawing on deep expertise across national security disciplines, including intelligence, diplomacy, military affairs, and law, we advocate for constitutional democracy, the rule of law, and the preservation of America’s national security institutions.

Powered by WPeMatico

Stephen Colbert mattered because he challenged power without cruelty. If corporations now silence or sideline voices that criticize Trump, citizens still possess leverage of their own: boycott and civic resistance.

I stayed up late last night, 21 May 2026, to watch the final episode of Stephen Colbert on The Late Show. I am nowhere close to late-night TV’s ideal audience member. For one thing, it’s on, as its name suggests, late; much too late for me. For another, I do not follow or know much about current “in” people, places, or things that are often the subjects of talk TV. But Stephen Colbert and I have something in common: we graduated from the same university, Northwestern, in Evanston, Illinois.

Of course, I graduated a decade or so before he did, and never set foot near any of its theater or other performing arts curriculum. I spent my time there “studying” history, political science, and languages, and went on to a 25 + year career in national security at the CIA. Mr. Colbert went to Northwestern to “study” dramatic acting, and upon graduation was accepted for an internship at Late Night with David Letterman. The rest is history.

Mr. Colbert is a brilliant communicator. He has said his mother brought him up to be Catholic while questioning the Church. His family suffered a tragedy when he was young. Mr. Colbert came through all of it, and in addition to being funny and insightful, he is decent in the extreme. At The Late Show, Mr. Colbert challenged conventional wisdom; he took verbal shots at well-known people and institutions. He ridiculed targets with more “power” and more “reach” than he had; he never aimed down at those people or organizations with less power and resources than he had. He didn’t bully. He didn’t try to intimidate, he didn’t mistreat, and he did not torment.

Enter Donald Trump and his collaborators.

Donald Trump cannot tolerate being the butt of a joke, which is interesting, given how many opportunities he has had to practice the role. At the same time, Donald Trump does everything possible to make himself as much a target of ridicule as any other living person, and his position, as President of the United States, increases the possibility that he will be mocked frequently, as presidents of the United States have been since the position was created.

Trump’s hair, his long tie, his head-forward posture, and his insistence on using a golf car are immediately visible and almost irresistible things to satirize. If you scratch that surface, his “language,” the way he speaks, his cowardice about firing anyone, and his incoherence at press conferences, increase the range and number of things that can be burlesqued. Even the ever-demure President Obama heckled Trump at the 2011 White House Correspondents Association Dinner, calling Trump out on his birther conspiracy theories and his “leadership” style on Celebrity Apprentice. Trump took that ribbing so badly that he decided to run for president and torch everything and anything Obama did while president.

As Mr. Colbert resumed his skewering of Trump after the 2024 election, our uber self-conscious president simmered until an episode during which Mr.Colbert, in his monologue, blasted CBS for paying Trump $16 million to settle Trump’s lawsuit against CBS for editing a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris in a way that constituted election interference. The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Texas. The lawsuit was frivolous. It was weak. There was no way it would ever have been won. The reason CBS gave for Mr. Colbert’s firing was that it was a “financial decision,” which is nonsense at every level. The late-night shows made their names while allowing the hosts (including Mr. Colbert) to make fun of the people who ran the network and the people who ran the country. At the time Mr. Colbert’s firing was announced, CBS’s Late Show with Stephen Colbert was the most highly rated late-night program.

Throughout this country, people are asking themselves what they can do to stop Trump’s march toward dictatorship. We will miss Mr. Colbert’s leadership, voice, and tremendous talent inspiring us each night to join in that effort. We know we should continue to participate in the No Kings marches; we must vote and help others in our community vote. Mr. Colbert’s legacy points to an additional tool in the box: The Boycott. We can and should also boycott the companies and their owners whose actions benefit Trump. Whether it’s media companies, like CBS/Skydance, or entities that push commerce like Amazon, these CEOs and their companies are propping Trump up and thereby encouraging his dictatorial ambitions. When you wonder what you can do at a time like this, you can boycott.

I know how extreme that feels, and is. And I know the time and money that it will cost. And, a boycott of something, maybe not everything, is something you can do. I grew up with an activist mother, and we boycotted all manner of things: products, places, or people that had ties to the John Birch Society, the Ku Klux Klan, and the National Socialist Liberation Front. I still boycott some products with political or social ties that I find difficult to square with my own beliefs. And, to this day, there are foods and paper products that I don’t buy because Mom disapproved of their political allies. I know they have been sold to non-offensive entities, entities with no political links or ambitions. But I can’t forgive them for their original links. It’s time we use our buying habits to aim at Trump and company.

Margaret Henoch served in the Clandestine Service of the CIA for 25 years, at Headquarters and in the field, focusing on operations and counterintelligence and retiring as a Senior Intelligence Officer. She is a member of The Steady State.

Founded in 2016, The Steady State is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) organization of more than 400 former senior national security professionals. Our membership includes former officials from the CIA, FBI, Department of State, Department of Defense, and Department of Homeland Security. Drawing on deep expertise across national security disciplines, including intelligence, diplomacy, military affairs, and law, we advocate for constitutional democracy, the rule of law, and the preservation of America’s national security institutions.

Powered by WPeMatico

Because my current residence is in Italy, I often watch internationally oriented news broadcasts produced in Europe. There may only be a few democratically minded European Union leaders who do not despair over the continuing absurd, nonsensical, self-serving, and ultimately hazardous decisions made by Mr. Trump.

Most seem to consider the man clownish—but clowns are supposed to be funny and not dangerous. From their perspective, this president lacks capability, capacity, and focus, while possessing no diplomatic skills, and recently appears to be of diminished cognitive ability, as well. During the first Trump Administration, the British writer Nate White put the matter this way: “He has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honor and no grace…” This situation clearly has not improved over time.

All of which results in something I never thought I would see in my lifetime. Today, America is often reviled in Europe.

Mr. Trump appears to have only a passing acquaintance with the truth, ignores proven science and condemns media representatives who have the temerity to ask questions concerning a plethora of wide ranging nonfactual and fanciful executive pronouncements. European leaders tend to tolerate him because of his inheritance of the twin cudgels of a large and effective military force, while representing a major trading partner. However, his illegal tariffs compelled Europe to look elsewhere for trading partners they can trust. Because of this president, America no longer fits that description. Europeans are asking the same question repeatedly: “After his first administration, why did Americans vote him in for a second?”

There was a time when America pursued the goal of attempting to become better than the sum of its disparate parts, no matter who was in office. Sadly, the administration has shoved the nation off that pedestal and the leadership of the European Union looks on in muted horror as Mr. Trump veers from one disastrous call to the next, while blaming everyone but himself. The current unnecessary war of choice with Iran is merely the latest in a series of horrible decisions. Unfortunately, his only regular supporters in the international community are right-wing tyrants, now one less with the electoral defeat of Viktor Orban in Hungary. While support for leaders such as these may have been in U.S. foreign policy interests to contain Communism in the distant past, what is America’s excuse now? I’m ashamed to say there isn’t one.

Share

Russia is a special case. Vladimir Putin no doubt appreciates the current White House resident; his intelligence services were found to have meddled in the election that put the multiple-bankrupt real estate mogul in the Oval Office the first time. Surely the Kremlin must see Mr. Trump as a “useful idiot.” Mr. Trump’s unconditional support of a corrupt Kremlin over the illegal war in Ukraine appears to be one of his very few consistent foreign policy positions. Otherwise, the confusion and incompetence that follows Air Force One wherever it flies these days, most recently the diplomatic debacle in China, provides some inkling of Moscow’s success in bringing America low.

There was a time when America stood for something positive around the globe beyond self-interest. Europe most appreciated this fact. Despite our nation’s missteps, the cornerstones of U.S. foreign policy used to be spreading democracy and free enterprise, while focusing on matters of international justice and human rights, even if the latter issues were sometimes given mere lip service. Tragically, those heady days have vanished. What made America truly great could always be found in its foundational instruments, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Because of the honorable and universal aspirations found within these keystone documents, Europeans formerly embraced the U.S. as the “leader of the free world.” From their perspective, this president has discarded that long-standing, hard-won, and honorable appellation with an “America First” doctrine, which is wholly transactional, utterly corrupt, and thoroughly authoritarian.

The bottom line: Europeans do not trust Mr. Trump. Where there is no trust, there is nothing but naked self-interest and personal gain. Is this what our country stands for now? If so, it is no surprise that today America is often vilified in Europe.

Leave a comment

Robert Bruce Adolph , a qualified Military Strategist,is a retired senior US Army Special Forces soldier. He holds graduate degrees in both National Security Studies & International Affairs and was formally trained as a counterintelligence special agent. Robert also taught university level courses in American Government, US History, and World Politics. Following his retirement from the active military, he joined the UN, subsequently seeing service in Sierra Leone, Yemen, Iraq, Egypt, Israel/Palestine, Indonesia and more, culminating in the role of Chief of the Middle East and North Africa at UN Headquarters in New York. He is the author of “Surviving the United Nations,” now out in a second edition. He is a member of The Steady State.

Founded in 2016, The Steady State is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) organization of more than 400 former senior national security professionals. Our membership includes former officials from the CIA, FBI, Department of State, Department of Defense, and Department of Homeland Security. Drawing on deep expertise across national security disciplines, including intelligence, diplomacy, military affairs, and law, we advocate for constitutional democracy, the rule of law, and the preservation of America’s national security institutions.

Powered by WPeMatico

In the latest episode of The Steady State Sentinel, Margaret Henoch (former senior CIA Operations Officer) sits down with Bob Drogin– a 38‑year veteran of the Los Angeles Times who served as a national correspondent, foreign correspondent, and ultimately White House editor during the first Trump administration. Drogin covered intelligence and national security for years, wrote Curveball: Spies, Lies, and the Con Man Who Caused a War, his book about the false WMD intelligence that helped lead the Bush administration into Iraq. He has seen journalism from its “golden age” to its current atomized, billionaire‑owned crisis.

Drogin is deeply alarmed, though not without a few reasons for hope. But he is clear‑eyed – and he has a list.

Here is what you need to know.

The List: Trump’s Assault on the Press

Drogin spent the night before the interview trying to catalog what the Trump administration has done to the media. The list is longer than most people realize.

“He is conducting an unprecedented, full‑out war against freedom of expression, against journalism, and against the First Amendment.”

Among the highlights:

  • Cutting funding for NPR and PBS

  • Threatening to revoke broadcast licenses for every network except Fox

  • Filing punitive lawsuits against the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, BBC, Des Moines Register, CNN, and even the board that issues Pulitzer Prizes

  • Barring the Associated Press from the White House briefing room because it won’t use Trump’s preferred name for the Gulf of Mexico

  • Taking over the White House press pool (a dedicated group of reporters that has been run independently by the White House Correspondents’ Association since FDR)

  • Banning reporters from the Pentagon unless they agree to use only government-approved handout material

  • Creating the “Wall of Shame,” a White House website where people can complain about specific journalists

  • Censoring government data and taking down websites on vaccines and climate change

  • Dismantling Voice of America and every other U.S. government‑backed broadcast outlet overseas

  • Installing cronies at the FCC

  • Arresting Don Lemon

  • Invading a reporter’s house and stealing her notes

  • Detaining and deporting journalists

At the same time, corporate owners have been settling frivolous lawsuits for millions of dollars: CBS paid $16 million. ABC/Paramount paid $16 million. YouTube paid $25 million.

“All of this has tremendous implications for freedom of the press and for democracy. He’s following the playbook of Viktor Orbán in Hungary, Vladimir Putin in Russia, Mussolini.”

What Happens When You Suppress the Press

Henoch asks the critical question: what does this do to democracy?

Drogin’s answer is straightforward. The whole point of the First Amendment is to provide an independent account of what the government does.

“We’re supposed to be watchdogs – not lapdogs and not attack dogs. And we have less and less access to the kind of information people need to make educated choices.”

The Iran war is a perfect example. Between the Iranians and Trump, it’s a blackout. No one knows what’s happening.

And because Trump creates so many outrages simultaneously – ICE raids, the war in Iran, blowing boats out of the water in the Caribbean – the incremental assault on the press gets lost.

“You add it up and you suddenly think, my God, he’s trying to destroy the First Amendment.”

Share

The White House Correspondents Dinner Security Threat: What Drogin Thinks it Revealed

Drogin offers his iconoclastic view of the night a would-be attacker apparently targeted the White House Correspondents Dinner but never made it into the ballroom.

First, thank God no one was hurt – and if anyone had been, it almost certainly would have been journalists.

Second, thank God Trump didn’t get to give his speech. He had promised it would be “the most inappropriate speech of all time.” Drogin is sure he would have spent an hour insulting and demeaning every journalist in the room.

Third, and here’s where Drogin becomes a self‑described hypocrite: he has attended the dinner 15 to 17 times, but he thinks it should be canceled.

“It’s an abomination. It should be shrunk back down to its original purpose – raising money for scholarships and giving awards – and get rid of all the celebrity suck‑up stuff.”

He recalls the 2011 dinner, where Obama famously insulted Trump. Trump has always denied that’s why he decided to run for president. “But who knows? He lies about everything.”

The real news that night, Drogin says, was that Obama had just signed off on the bin Laden raid. It was postponed because of weather and happened the next day. Trump was not the big story.

The Golden Age Was Brief – And We’re Going Back to the Past

Drogin debunks the myth that newspapers have always been trustworthy and steadfast.

Go back 100 years: every town had multiple papers. Big cities had 10 or 20. Press lords like Joseph Pulitzer (father of yellow journalism) and William Randolph Hearst (who pushed the U.S. into the Spanish‑American War) dominated. The Chandlers in Los Angeles and the Annenbergs in Philadelphia ran right‑wing papers.

The “golden age” of journalism began with Watergate and lasted only about 30 years – until eBay and then social media ate the business model.

Now we are back to an atomized landscape, with billionaire owners like Jeff Bezos (Washington Post) and Patrick Soon‑Shiong (Los Angeles Times) pulling editorials they don’t like. CBS made changes involving Barry Weiss, whom Drogin described as far more political than the previous CBS News leadership. Ellison is about to take over CNN and is expected to turn it into a Trump mouthpiece.

“We’re going back to the past – what it looked like 100 years ago. The good old days were maybe 30 years.”

How to Find Trusted News in the Supermarket of Information

Henoch asks the question everyone is struggling with: where should people go for reliable information?

Drogin admits there are no easy answers. Everyone gets to pick their own topics now. He personally reads The Steady State every day, along with Foreign Policy, The Atlantic, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post.

“Not every story in the New York Times is 100% correct. But overall, they are trying. Nobody is deliberately putting their thumb on the scale.”

He also follows a number of Substack writers and spends too much time staring at screens. He just signed up for an online course on Shakespeare’s Hamlet and King Lear because he needs to get his head out of the news for a little while.

For younger people? Drogin laughs.

“No young person has ever asked me for any advice. Ever.”

When he tried to warn his own children about what they put on the internet, his son innocently asked, “What’s a front page?”

What Gives Him Hope?

Despite everything, Drogin finds a few reasons for hope.

First, Trump isn’t entirely succeeding. Courts have thrown out his $10 billion lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and lawsuits against the Post and the New York Times. There is starting to be pushback.

Second, the midterms could change things – though he warns not to trust polls. (Ask President Hillary Clinton or President Kamala Harris about polling.)

Third, the sheer volume of information available today – even with AI and deepfakes – is exciting. Everyone has a cell phone. Everyone is a witness.

“When I was a foreign correspondent, my job was to be the eyes and ears of our readers. Now everybody is taking pictures and video. In theory, there’s a much greater flood of information out there from which you can draw your opinions.”

But he ends with a sobering metaphor from a voter in Atlanta:

“Just because I don’t like my rabbi doesn’t mean I’m going to become a Catholic.”

Disliking Trump is not the same as embracing the alternative.

One Quote That Stays With You

“Thomas Jefferson famously said he’d rather have a media without a government than a government without a media. Look at Trump – he’s out of control.”

— Bob Drogin

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

Listen and Watch the full Podcast Here:

Founded in 2016, The Steady State is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) organization of more than 400 former senior national security professionals. Our membership includes former officials from the CIA, FBI, Department of State, Department of Defense, and Department of Homeland Security. Drawing on deep expertise across national security disciplines, including intelligence, diplomacy, military affairs, and law, we advocate for constitutional democracy, the rule of law, and the preservation of America’s national security institutions.

Powered by WPeMatico